Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Las Vegas - October 1, 1948 W 23-1-47 Mr. Wa. Reinhardt: C cc - Mr, 1. S. Bennett Mr* 0. M. Cory) Referring to Mr. Strong's flit 1-7331** containing correspondence with Waale-C&mplan it Tlberti concerning application for extension of water mains to serve Samamsa Village Tract* Tlberti has already purchased and has strung out on the ground about 3500 feet of 10-inch and 12-inch east iron pipe to be oonneoted to the Railroad Company* a 24- inch transmission main to serve Bonansa Village. He advisee the pipe cost $13,000. Last week when Masers. Adamson and Kaeg were here, we conferred further with Tlberti and estimated that he would bs faced with an additional cash out-lay of about 120,000 to cover the labor required in installing the pipe line plus half the cost of the pumping equipment. Attached Is letter received this morning from Public Service Commission together with copy of Tlberti * s letter to them raising the queetlon of whether the sub-dividers should be required to pay any of the cost of the pumping equipment. This is the first instance of this kind that has arisen since our adoption of Rule 9-A covering water main extensions. kill be glad to have the benefit of your advice. If a public hearing were held on the question, I assume the Commission would rule that the subdivider would be required to advance only the cost of making water main extension; and that ths responsibility for providing adequate service, after such extension is made, would rest with the Utility. A. IS® Folgsr