Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000162 59

Image

File
Download upr000162-059.tif (image/tiff; 26.29 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000162-059
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

50 purchase on the other systems. Plat-rate charges on the other systems In reference to do­mestic service (see following tabulation) indicate that while all such charges appear low, yet Las Vegas charges, both actual and proposed, are not unfavorable. I m Monthly Flat Rate Charge Bakersfield $2.76 Barstow 2.60 Hanford 3.09 Visalia 2.35 Reno 2.75 Las Vegas - present rate 2.00 proposed rate 2.70 1/ For 5-room house with toilet and bath. Average Dollar Billing and Purchasing Value of Dollar Chart A (page l l 'a ) shows r a t h e r c le a r ly : 1. That the average dollar revenue received per customer has remained practically constant during the past ten years; the year­ly average during this period has been $27.04 compared with $26.22 received in 1949 and $26.51 (not shown on chart) estimated for 1950 at present rates. 2. That the purchasing value of the dollar (commodity prices-U. S. Department of Labor Indexes) has declined very materially in comparison with the year 1940 and on that comparison the 1949 Index Is but 0.53 and the 1950 index 0.54. Thus a dollar in 1950 will only purchase 54$ of what it did in 1940, or it takes about $1.85 today to buy what a dollar did In 1940. 3. That the customer income has generally risen approxi­mately 70$ since 1940, with, of course, natural variations between different classes of wage earners and between individuals. Such in­crease in dollar income has to a considerable degree offset the decline in the purchasing power of the dollar. An increase in water rates would, therefore, be doing for the Water Utility what wage and