Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000160 2

Image

File
Download upr000160-002.tif (image/tiff; 23.68 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000160-002
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    £3t F r J'idaySept. 16, ' 1949 9 ^ | H | 4^ B f t * egas May] Water System Company, City Officials in Mood for Sale Possibility that the city cf Las Vegas may negotiate for the pur­chase of the water system owned by the~Las Vegas Land and Water company since the town was founded in 1905, loomed today as a, re­sult of a conference between the city commission and representatives of the local utility. ' y ~ — “ Leo A. McNafnee, attorney for ,j the water company, told the mayor and four commissioners he felt the plan could he worked out and that, if the city was in a position to assume the finan- ; _cial. burden involved, the water company would be willing to make the sale. Book value of the utility at ?the present time was placed at i $1,125,000 by McNamee. | Three members of the city I commission expressed them­selves as being in favor of the! proposal, stating that if the com-; pany is to be sold it should go to the city. j The plan is to name a special: •j committee from the commis­sion’s advisory group for the purpose of making a complete • investigation of the feasibility of i the project and report back to V !?! the board at an early date. j Indications were, members of the city commission said, that due to continued growth | of the city and the demand for expansion of facilities at considerable additional capital investment, officials of the utility were in a mood to work ; out details of a sale. McNamee advised the board that the company was prepared to send representatives to any future meeting called to explore the matter further.