UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Mr. C. 1. Sexton, Chairman, Public service Cammlsslen, Careen City, Nevada. Pear Sir: ie per eur phene cenversatien. We have redrafted the rule cavering *Defence Housing Prejectg* and have re-numbered ease a« Rule 9-e, e e as net to eenfllet with the preposed Male 9-b that was submitted in Case No. 1126, as it is oar thought that a defense housing project should be distinguished from extensions to ordinary real estate subdivisions. In Ilea of the word "adjacent*, as submitted in the proposal that Mr. Bracken handed you, we have substituted *a distance from the Company' 8 nearest existing eater stain, equal to not more than 20 feet multiplied by the number of houses1* constructed clthln the project. This wording will cover all contemplated projects of this character that ee knee of. As ee do not know where this rule, if approved, will come in on the FSCN sheets, we have left out the reference thereto and also Rules 10 and 11, which were at the end of your suggested Buie 9-b. Would appreciate Quick action on this proposal as pending projects are awaiting approval of contracts. Very truly yours, ee-Mr. Mr. Mr, Mr. Bennett Bracken Strong Guild ISO A. iCMAlEl
