Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000142 108

Image

File
Download upr000142-108.tif (image/tiff; 25.62 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000142-108
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    and transpiration factors. The practicability of pursuing such a study is necessarily limited by the use to which such information could be put if final conclusions indicate a need for measures to protect an adverse discharge condition. ”In the case of Las Vegas Valley, collection reser­voirs for temporary storing and desilting prior to spreading operations could not be considered a practicable undertaking. In Willow Creek, eight miles west of Las Vegas, the W.P.A. and C.C.C. made an abortive effort at spreading water, but after a season’s trial the gravels were so drowned with silt that the project was rendered useless." Mr. Greene's study indicates that owing to structural conditions, no part of the large areas indicated upon his Map No. 1 as Zone contributes to the recharge of the Artesian Belt, and that run-off and evaporation loss greatly reduces the recharge factor from Zones 1, 2 and J>. It is hie opinion that a greater part of our recharge comes from the smaller area indicated as Zone 1. I think it is obvious that it is not possible to measure or even to accurately estimate the rate of recharge of this reservoir, so to determine whether we are withdrawing water faster than nature is recharging the supply we must depend upon observation of productivity and recorded pressures in producing wells. This record shows a decline in production in nine of our ten wells in the period 19*4-2 to 19U-H- of $.2$, indicating an average annual decline in production of *+. 1%, We have recorded corresponding pressure reductions for the same period varying (5) V