Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000137 110

upr000137 110
Download upr000137-110.tif (image/tiff; 26.42 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000137-110

Permalink

http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/d1j38np73
Details

Member of

Water conservation campaign

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Los Angeles - Aug. 16, I960 @0 Mr. feu Reinhardt* Ceos Mr. f .¥• Boc&ea - Omaha Mr. H.H. Hulsizer - * ) MR. A.M. FOLGER - LAS VEGAS - personal Supplementing my letter of August 2nd In aon-neotlon with hearing before the City Commissioners of the City of Las Vegas, Monday, July 31st; I enclose oopy of letter from the City Attorney of Las Vegas to the Public Service Commission of Nevada, dated August 10th, In which you will note they have demanded that the Public Service Commission require the Hater Company to proceed immediately to augment the present water supply in the City of Las Vegas. I discussed this matter with Mr, Allard, Pr si-dent of the Public Service Commission and he stated that In view of the letter he would have to have a public hearing but because of the crowded condition of their calendar, it would probably be set for sometime after September 18 th. He also stated that he assumed the City would have an engineer present who would qualify to testify as to the method of increasing te present water supply. I presume it mX$it be desirable sometime to discuss this matter and possibly for us to employ an engineer to review the earlier studies made by represent­atives of your department and be prepared to offer rebuttal testimony to any testimony offered by the City. I anticipate, as stated In my letter of August 2nd, that the State may have Mr. Shamberger testify but 1 could not get Mr. Allard to commit himself definitely on that point. 1, 1. Bennett Eno« EEB:AF