Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000137 53

Image

File
Download upr000137-053.tif (image/tiff; 23.52 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000137-053
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Las Vegas, w October 24, 1945 . CV/ v / W 23-1-B ™ i v/. A f Mr. Frank Strong: This has reference to your letter October 18th concerning the subject of water conservation in the Las Vegas Artesian Basin. We have analyzed your letter, as well as yours of the 1 2 th, and have discussed this with the General Attorney. Let me emphasize at the outset that I am not “proposing to furnish water for agricultural purposes.“ I have consistently and agressively opposed the use of water from the city mains for agricultural purposes, and I am opposed to it now. The proposed use of water on the Searles tract will be strictly for domestic use9— “the i i H u i r u u ......( I a s s u f l l s ) i t l e — i n - t e n d e d a r t t h e e o u £ h - s ± d e ,j C L f Charleston Boulevard where the three-tees are to be set for ~de 11 vering water to the McNell_Jtract. With regard to your proposal that a water committee be appointed to protect the interests of the Valley in conserving the underground water supply, such an organization now exists. In 1940, we discussed with the State Engineer the potential depletion of the under­ground water supply by promiscuous issuance of drilling permits in the Las Vegas Valley, where more than 400 wells now exist. His response was that in the absence of any protest he had no other course than to grant the permit. However, recognizing the eerloueness of the threat to the underground