Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000134 4

Image

File
Download upr000134-004.tif (image/tiff; 26.42 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000134-004
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Los Angeles, March 26,19^6. Mr, A. H. Scribner? (a / ^ 0 ' ' (ce- Mr. ¥. R. Bracken Mr. Frank Strong Mr. 1. 1, Bennett Mr, Leo A. McNamee) Re Nevada taxes- LVL&W, Supplementing my letter of March 11 on the sub­ject of Nevada taxes: in conversation last week with Mr, <!*$> Allard of the Nevada Tax and Public Utilities Commissions, 1 was advised, that our statement that the LVLAW water plant was operated at a loss, was not taken seriously; that the additional water distribution facil­ities now being constructed by the Railroad 2k inch pipe line and l£ million gallon reservoir - were considered as necessary facilities of the LVL&W which are essential for water service in the southerly additions to has Vegas; that water facilities constructed by the Railroad in recent years in the area west of its yards-as wells, pipe lines, pQmps,©te.,were likewise consider­ed as essential to the hVLAW water plant; we furnish Itemised statements showing as to the area west of the yards the investment of the Rail­road in water production and distribution facilities for each of the past six years; that the amounts of interest and depreciation charged the LVLAW by the Railroad are exhorbltant: that the value of the facilities on which LVLAW pays the Rail­road rental should be in the LVL&W investment account and that rental paid therefor is not a proper operating charge; there will be a substantial increase In the %$k& assessment of the LVL&W water plant. Mr. C. B. Sexton, who was Allard’s predecessor, regularly protested the LVL&W reports as being incomplete and unsatisfactory for his purposes in arriving at a Valuation of the water plant, and particularly he objected to the terms of the rental contract with the Railroad which he considered ex­orbitant and unjustifiable. The contentions of Mr, Allard are identical with those first advanced by Mr, Sexton in 19^0, S