Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Los Angeles, April 30, 1927 Dear Walter: I have yours of the 28th and note that Mr. De Vinney, the County Assessor, requested to see our hook values of Las Vegas Land & Water Company. You have Form 141 Las Vegas Land & Water Company General Balance Sheet -Assets, March 31, 1927, and under the first item real estate unimproved and the second item improved real estate and miscellaneous property, is reflected all of the property of Las Vegas Land & Water Company situate in Clark County, Nevada, with its hook valuation as shown hy the’company*s records here. From the total investments, as shown on this sheet* you can deduct the investments in physical property in California, including the water system at Yerrao and other investments, -Anaheim Union Water Company^ stock and Liberty Loan bonds. I took the matter up with Mr. Charles Adams, our Tax Agent,and also with Mr. Halsted, who suggested that I go over the situation with Mr. Barry, and there is no reason why you should not show Mr. DeVinney this balance sheet, and I advise that you do so, and inform him that it is the book value of the company*s holdings. The valuations, of course, in Las Vegas and vicinity must be uniform and the land and other holdings of the company cannot be valued higher than similar property in the same locality for assessment purposes. I understand that there is a general move to raise valuations in Las Vegas City as well as in Clark County, but I am inclined to think that Mr. DeVinney will be fair with us if we do not withhold any information and disclose the situation fully as it is. FRM: I F. R, McNamee