upr000105 298

Mr. W. R. Rouse 4. December 21, 1951 ; If State engineer would be and I am asking us his views as to the practicability o fM rt.r anCsofrye rrtoi nggive opuern deenxtilsyt inpgr ovaipdper opthrei aRtaiiolnr tooa d a wwietlhl awn hiacshs uwrodudl ds upipnldye.­gas LaI ndb elainedv eW atI era m Ccoomrpraencyt doiens sntoatt inngo wt htaatk e tmheo reL asw atVeer­afprpormo ptrhei awtaitonesr fsoi etlhde thtarann sifs erj usoft itfhiee d Rabiyl riotasd , exaipsptrionpgr i­waotuilodn tsou ggaensott hetrh atw eltlhe shDoiuvlids ionont ocffuirctearisl iatnsd tshuep plIyn.d us­I Rtariilarlo aEdn girneeqeuri reatm enLtoss aAtn geLlaess ,V ewgahso aanrde tfhaem ilpioatre ntwiiatlhitthiees of the shop grounds, give consideration to the most prac­tical manner of developing an independent supply for the Railroad Company. If the Railroad had an independent supply in excesss .V offe asiitbs lei mtmoe dicaotnet innueeed st,h e itp reaspepneatr sc otnot ramec t tbhaett weite nw otuheld be Rwaaitlerro afdu rnCiosmhpeadn y tao ndt het heP .FP..EF.. E.w aso n stuhrep ltush eowratye trh aotn lyt.he The amount of water furnished to others as surplus water would not then be so disproportionate to the Railroad use as it is at present. vent tI hec and omseees tinoc atrieoans onof ftrhoem Ua niloegna lL ansdt anCdopmopiannty taon d ptrhee­Vtergaanss feLra ndo f antdhe Waptreerse nCto mrpeaanly eisnt atthea t hosltdatien gst o otfh et heU niLaosn Land Company. I do not believe that there should be an y trouble in the State of Nevada.^ I am asking Mr. Cory to give us his views on that question. I E. E. Bennett bcc - MMrr.. WCma.l vRieni Mn.h arCdotr y I I am handing you herewith copy of Mr. Rouse’s let­ter to Mr. Stoddard dated December l£, 1951.