Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000105 30

Image

File
Download upr000105-030.tif (image/tiff; 23.59 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000105-030
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. m. Reinhardt 7. December p| 1951 that company. It could also be accomplished by transfer­ring th® distribution facilities of th® Railroad Company to the Las Vegas Land and water Company and have that com­pany transfer all other assets except water production and distribution assets to a new corporation. I think the lat­ter plan has advantages. The Las Vegas Land and ater Company is now acting as a public utility in the distribution of water and it need not obtain the approval of the Nevada Public Service Com­mission for th© purchase of the water production facili­ties of the Railroad Company and the continuance of oper­ations as a public utility. I new corporation acquiring both th® production and distribution facilities would have to comply with action 6137 of the Nevada Compiled Taws, which requires every public utility before beginning oper­ations to obtain from th® Public erviee Commission a cer­tificate that th® present or future public convenience or necessity requires the commencement of such operations. In considering such an application the Commission might at­tempt to control th© capital structure and organizational setup of the new company. By continuing to us© the Las Vegas Land and ater Company as a distribution company we would be reasonably free from interference by th® Commis­sion. I am certain that the Commission would approve of a transfer of the production facilities to a distribution company, but I do not believe w© should give the Commis­sion an opportunity to impose conditions on that transfer. k suggested plan is that we transfer th® water produc­tion facilities to the Las Vegas Land and Water Company, change its corporate name to Las Vegas ater Company and have th© company transfar all of its assets other than wa­ter production and distribution -to a new land company hav­ing an appropriate corporate name. There are certain prob­lems to be considered in making such a transfer. I do not have th® final answer on many of them and I think the en­tire problem should be given careful consideration by all interested parties before a definite determination is made to go ahead with the Ian which I have been discussing. Mr. Rsnwiok recently wrote Er, 'ehe advising him that we intended to make a recommendation to you concerning the transfer of the water production facilities and asking him