Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000094 118

Image

File
Download upr000094-118.tif (image/tiff; 23.24 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000094-118
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    (bcc - Mr. Wm. Reinhardt) April 14* 1953 Pile 80-11 Mr. A. E. Cahlan Ms Vegas Review Journal 737 North Main Street Las Vegas* Nevada Dear Sirs I have a copy of Mr. Campbell’s letter to you of April 11* 1933* concerning the status of the negotiations for the purchase of the water system at Las Vegas by the Las Vegas Valley Water District. Z think there is a misunderstanding on the part of Mr. Campbell that the Union Pacific repre­sentatives sure charging the District with delay in bringing the negotiations to a final conclusion. In ray telephone con­versation with you on April 10th X indicated that the Union Pacific was not holding up the negotiations* but, on the con­trary* had submitted a draft of an agreement to the District for consideration. It was not my purpose to indicate that there was delay on the part of the District in considering it. Mr. Renwlek tells me that there has been no disposition on the part of Mr, Hamilton to delay the negotiations relat­ing to the purchase and sale agreement and that he has never Intended to indicate the contrary in any conversations he has had with Mr. Hamilton, In spite of some of the statements in Mr, Campbell's letter 1 want to go on record as saying that X do not be­lieve that either party to these negotiations has delayed them. We are willing to continue to cooperate with the District and its representatives to the fullest extent to bring the agreement to an early conclusion. It takes considerable time for each side to consider and formulate proposals in connection with a transaction of this kind. So far as the Railroad is concerned propos­als which are made to it must be considered by a number of