Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Pag© 3. At the time of transmitting Mr. Stoddard's February 6 acceptance letter to the District, Mr. Bennett stated that a draft of the final agreement would be completed by the Railroad Company's Law Department within a maximum of two weeks. March 23, 1953: The District received in Las Vegas from the Union Pacific Legal Deportment m Los Angeles the first typewritten draft of the proposed purchase agreement. The draft bore a ddte of March 16, 1953 but was not dispatched from Los Angeles until March 22. Immediately upon receipt, copies of this draft were furnished to ail Directors of the District, its Counsel and Engineer. An exchange of correspondence and several conferences and meetings by District members and advisors followed. April 7, 1953: The first conference between legal representatives of the Railroad Company and the District was held in Los Angeles. April 15, 1953: At a meeting of the District, the members requested District legal Counsel May to urge that a meeting between officials of the Company and the District Board of Directors be arranged in Less Vegas within a week from that date. i 953: Vice-President Reinhardt of the Union Pacific Raf Iroad definitely agreed upon a Los Vegas meeting date Friday, May €. Because this date conflicted with other prior engagements of District Counsel and members, It was finally agreed that the meeting would be held In Las Vegas at 9 o'clock Tuesday morning. May 12, 1953. May 8, i ?‘S3: Vice President Reinhardt of the Railroad Company, In a telephone conversation to the District's President, stated that in his opinion a meeting on May 12 would be premature because counsel for the Railroad Company and the District have not yet reached a final agreement or definite disagreement on all points. He suggested that the meeting be postponed until a later indefinite date. After taking the matter up with members of the District, the President informed Mr. Reinhardt that the District Directors were firmly of the opinion that the time has definitely arrived when Railroad Company officials and executives clothed with authority to settle matters of policy, adjudicate controversial points, and make final decisions, should meet with the Directors of the District. May 9, 1953.