UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
igj f<w/ Los Angeles, July Mr* Wm* Reinhardt: (oe - nr* w. H* lulsizq t/' Mr. 1* 1* Bennett*'' Mr. Edward C . Renwlck Mr. 1. L. Adamson) Conference was held with Mr. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineer for the Las Vegas Water District on July 14th in which he took the position that the following adjustments, as indicated In Parts XX to IV of this letter, should be made to the estimated Depreciated Reproduction Costs as submitted by his company and as shown in my Summary dated June 18, 1952 when the matter of "Sale Price" is taken under consideration by representatives of the Railroad Company and the Water District* I Breakdown of District Depreciated Reproduction Cost as ner Statement of June 18. 1952 District Reproduction Estimated Cost of New - Less Depreciation Cost-Less Peer as of 12-31-50 LA&SL Production facilities LVLfeW Distribution Facilities Additions to May 1. 1952 11,090,148 1.030.511 *2,120,6$$ Production facilities Distribution Facilities Distribution Services # 55,025 172,890 22.311 250,226 Overhead Percentage and Freight Production Facilities —— Appraisal Freight on Additions Additions 1 94,914 2,751 5,030 Distribution Facilities Appraisal Additions Services # 89,721 10,994 204,829 lotal Depreciated Cost by District *2.575.734 -1-
