Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000089 59

Image

File
Download upr000089-059.tif (image/tiff; 23.12 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000089-059
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr.E,E, Bennett #3 As stated by you, it appears that the law in Nevada is similar to that in California and that a provision for liquidated damages will not he enforced unless it is ex­tremely difficult or impracticable to fix actual damages, provided that the amount of damages so fixed is reasonable. However, because there is no prohibition in Nevada against liquidated damages, the defendant has the burden of showing that the provision for liquidated damages is a penalty and therefore unenforcible. I understand the contrary is true in California where the burden is on the plaintiff to both plead and prove such facts as may be necessary to validate his right to recover liquidated damages by showing the im­practicability or extreme difficulty of fixing actual damages. Sincerely, CMC/b CALVIN M. CORY