Information
Digital ID
upr000067-051
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Re: A d d i t i o n s and Be t t e r m e n t s to the Las Vegas L a n d and W ter Company System Los -Angeles - Novem b e r 16, 1953 Mr. C. M. Cory - Las Vegas As a m a t t e r of in f o r m a t i o n in the event the subject should b e d i s c u s s e d with you, I attach hereto copy of letter from the Las Vegas Valley Water District to Mr. R inhardt, da t e d N o v e m b e r 7th, on the above subject, and copy of Mr. R g i n h a r d t ’s reply, dated Nove m b e r 13th. Frankly, I do not think this exchange of correspondence will result in any change in the D i s t r i c t ’s insistence that we secure three bids on these contracts. I have talked b o t h to Mr. H a m i l t o n and Mr. M o n t g o m e r y and i n t i m a t e d that I thought they were quite technical in suggesting this three b i d p r o p o s i tion, as I could not d i f f e rentiate in the situation before the bonds were v o t e d and after the bonds were voted since the Water Company is still oper a t e d by us and not b y the District. However, Mr. R inhardt felt we should go on r e c o r d expressing our views, and for that reason I suggested the letter of November 13th. E. E. Bennett