upr000066 160

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 it was 3b, 7. There * s a difference—a little less is 19^9 than 155. X9b8, That*e the measured withdrawal. Q, ini in addition to that, there would be some — 4* There would be that water that*s lest through transpor­tation and evaporation, which was estimated at five te 8,000 acre feet, Q. flow, Hr. Jameson, X believe you have some specific data on certain wells which vow mentioned by name yesterday, is that right? A. fes, t have some data on those wells, Q. Ten have no data on the present production of the Searles well, have you? A, Ho, sir, X have no measurements that were taken during the high period use or during the summer months, of that well. Q, 1 understood that the only measurements you had was in January 1950. A. That*a right, Q, Have you any other wells in which you have the high and lew measurements, and If so, will you tell us the name, the loca­tion and the figures. A, X have the Boger well, which was mentioned to me yester­day—the measurement that was taken in March of 19bf, and another one in September—the first part of September—I think the 2nd of September, of that same year. The March measurement was taken$ that is, the time of low withdrawals, frees the Talley, It showed a discharge of 1250 gallons a minute. The September measurement was taken at the time that the withdrawal over the whole Talley had been heavy. It showed 7^5 gallons per minute.