Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
% (bee - Kr. A« S. fcoddard) Hr* m. Reinhardt ) llr * it. Rouse Mr. v,. H. Hulaiaer) i ir*. -i. Sutton ) Kr. . H. Johnson* )i~ Mr. Galvin ??. Cory) one copy of revised sheets to each December 17, 1951 File 4705-11-22 Hr* tee 8. Scott, ecretary Public ervice Commission of Nevada Carson City, Nevada Dear Hr* 3cotts 1 enclose First Revised Sheet PSCH So* 2, First Revised Sheet * ecu Ho* 5 and Original -'heat f:S€i lo* |a in the tariff of water rate# of the Lae Yogas Land and Water Company at lata Vegas, Nevada * These sheets eliminate notela fro* rate Iten Ho* 9 and establish new rates for motels under rate Xtes 37*• The rate changes mentioned are not made voluntarily by the Lea Vegas Lend and Water Company, and the tariff sheets above mentioned era sent to you for filing solely in compliance with the Order of the Commission dated December 10,1951, which purports te have been made at a general session of the Commission on j/osember 7, 1951. The above mentioned rate changes are made and the tariff sheets are sent you for filing under pretest for the reason that the Order of the Commission hove mentioned is unlawful and arbitrary for the following reasons! 1* It provides for a retroactive reduction in rates• 2* The rate changes required further redoes the revenues of the Las Vegas Land and \atar Company and take its property without due process of law* 3* The Order is not supported by the evidence, but is contrary to the evidence in I & $ Docket ho* 127. 4* ;-a are informed and be Have that the Order was made as a result of a complaint made by the mo-