Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000065 246

Image

File
Download upr000065-246.tif (image/tiff; 26.59 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000065-246
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    m Railroad Company and the Water Company in arriving at a proper rate base, the rate of return which should be earned by the Railroad Company and the Water Company, the amount of opera­tion and maintenance expenses which should be allowed to the Railroad Company and the Water Company in fixing rates and a forecast of the capital additions, revenues and expenses which will be experienced by the Railroad Company and the Water Com­pany in the year 1952. to earn any return at all, but suffered a deficit of ^41,939.93. It is expected that unless the rates of the Water Company are further increased over and above the increases authorized by the Commission’s Order of August 24, 1951, as decreased by the Commission’s Order of December 7, 1951, the Water Company will also suffer a substantial deficit in the calendar year 1952. tied case be re-opened and that a further hearing be granted at the earliest possible moment to the end that rates shall be prescribed by the Commission which will afford the peti­tioner substantial and prompt relief and enable the petition­er to earn a fair return upon a reasonable rate base. VI In the calendar vear 1951 th e ,Tater Company failed THEREFORE the petitioner prays that the above enti- Respectfully submitted, E. E. BENNETT "Attorneys Tor Las Vogas Land and Water Company 7. Dated, Februarv 1, 1952