Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000065 236

Image

File
Download upr000065-236.tif (image/tiff; 27.02 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000065-236
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    V ceeded the estimates of such costs which were offered in evi­dence by the Water Company at the former hearings in the above entitled case and the estimates of such costs used by the Com­mission in its said Opinion of August 24, 1951. As a result the amounts found by the Commission in its Opinion and Order of August 24, 1951, to be the cost of maintaining and operat­ing the water production fscilitj.es of the Railroad Company and the water distribution facilities of the Water Company during the year 1951 were substantially less than the actual costs incurred by said companies during the calendar year 1951. Accordingly the rates prescribed by the Commission in its Orders of August 24, 1951, and December 7, 1951, make an insufficient allowance for the operating and maintenance ex­penses incurred by the Railroad Company and the Water Company during the year 1951 and which will be incurred during the year 1952. If a rehearing is granted in this case, your pe­titioner will offer evidence concerning the actual increase in such costs incurred in the calendar year 1951 and the a- mount of such costs which is to be expected in the calendar year 1952. IV On October 20, 1951, after the close of the former hearings in the above entitled case the Congress of the Unit­ed Spates enacted the 1951 Revenue Act, which, effective as of April 1, 1951, increased the tax rate on normal net income of corporations from 25$ to 27$ and the rate on surtax net in­5.