Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
\ h&@ order on the bringing of Lake Mood, water to bos Vegae by m of a pipe line, ponding and storage system* In a report^/ on tbs present and future water supply for Las Vegas Valley, prepared for tbs water District, toe feasibility end cost of each a project has been set forth, based upon toe assumption that the entire existing Lee Vegas eater system would be acquired by to® District and that Its (the system*s) present water resources would be utilised* In this connection toe report states i ®¥lto the aequiai- & tion of these properties the low-cost water fro© the well fields will, in some measure, offset the high-cost water from Lake Mead*. It is further estimated that under combined system operation in 1930, the average cost of water would be #31*80 per million gallons compared with #33*33 paid by toe customers of ? toe .Las Vegas Land and Water Company in 1343 and #34*72 in 1949* Shat represents an increase of some 53$ • Sash increase .in annual coats when capitalised at present rate of water consumption is in excess of #900,000 - the equivalent capital investment saved by toe low-cost water from tbs well fields of toe water utility and production company* Likewise toe capitalised annual costs due to saving in pa®f* facilities is a very material figure* Attention should likewise be called to tbs fact that tbs present-day land values claimed of #100 per acre on little more then half of the water-bearing acreage are merely normal values for the surface rights for ordinary uses, and do not include any Increment in value because of the water-bearing character of the land. the water companies recognise (for rate making, but not in mm of sale) the propriety of sharing with toe public toe very high intrinsic value actually residing in the water rights* Therefore the #30,000 amount is looked upon as the Minima upon which a 1/ Sy Oreeley and Hansen, Engineers - under date of October, 1349 jj/ Underscoring added 5*