Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000061 302

Image

File
Download upr000061-302.tif (image/tiff; 26.72 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000061-302
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Proposed increase in water rates - Las Vegas Los Angeles, April 1, 1931. Mr. P. H. Knickerbocker: I am Just in receipt from Leo of a copy of the new schedule of rates which has bees worked up by Mr. Bracken’s office. These rates are identical with the last schedule submitted on February 20, 1930, accompanied by Mr. Bracken’s letter of February 18. Interest at &% is figured on a valuation of $281,928.05. This Includes the maximum valuation of #200,000 placed by our valuation department on the water rights of Las Vegas Land & Water Company, plus our general ledger balance of #81,278.05, plus $650.00 for 4" redwood pipe required under work order 152. In our conference of February 20, 1931, It was decided to use an interest rate of on the valuation of facilities, and this should include a fair valuation on the water. I would suggest that we have another conference here In my office, if agreeable, say on April 15, as the matter of substituting flat rates In the place of meter rates will have to be considered, because the Legislature approved an act, affective now, which provides that it shall be unlawful for any public utility, for any purpose or object whatever, in any city or town containing more than 4500 inhabitants, to install, operate or use, within such city or town, any meahanlcal water meter, or similar mechanical device, to measure the quantity of water delivered to water users. F. R. McKamee FRM-MK cc Mr. A. S. Halsted Mr. #alter Brackan^ Mr. R, L. Adamson Mr. Leo A. McHamee