Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

man000173 105

Image

File
Download man000173-105.tif (image/tiff; 27.62 MB)

Information

Digital ID

man000173-105
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Page 2. December 23, 1953: General Solicitor Bennett of the Railroad Company, informed Attorney Leo McNamee, local counsel for the District, that when the October 15 drafts were sent on to executives In Omaha, the latter requested that someone go back and discuss them. As a result, Mr. Edward C . Renwick, Assistant General Solicitor went to Omaha for this purpose. In his letter of this data, Mr. Bennett stated: l;| om sorry about this delay, but I am sure, since you know the workings of the law department of the Railroad, and that we have to clear these matters with our executives in Omaha before making any submission, handling it in this way will in the end expedite the consummation of the transaction. | January V3, 1953: A final redraft as revised by the Union Pacific legal staff under the direc­tion of executives, was submitted to the District for consideration, approval and execution. Copies were immediately furnished to all members, counsel and Engineer J . M. Montgomery for study, Approximately two weeks was consumed by the Dis­trict in processing. January 31, i 953: The final purchase proposal draft submitted to the District on January 13 by the Railroad Company was executed by the District after applying certain minor modifications recommended by the District's Counsel and Engineer. February 12, 1953: General Solicitor Bennett transmitted from Lcs Vegas to the District a letter dated February 6, 1953, signed by A. E. Stoddard, President, accepting the proposal of the Board of Directors of the Las Vegas Valley Voter District dated January 3 i , i 953. Mr. Stoddard's February 6 acceptance letter contained the following reservations and limiting conditions: "Your proposal and this acceptance do not constitute a binding contract of purchase and sale, but ore intended only to state the basis upon which formal agreements will be prepared for execution by you and by the undersigned. 1 The formal agreements between the utility for the purchase and sale of the property will terminate December3,1 V53 in the event that the District shall not have paid the full purchase price into escrow on or before that date. "If the utility and the District are unable to reach an agreement within three months (from February 6) upon the terms of formal agreement covering purchase and sale, the Railroad Company reserves the right to discontinue negotiations or any further obligation. " (Note: This would have the effect of limiting completion of the Agreements now being formulated to a deadline of May (t, 1953 which is now past).