Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Las Vegas City Commission Minutes, November 20, 1957 to December 2, 1959, lvc000011-449

Image

File
Download lvc000011-449.tif (image/tiff; 57.42 MB)

Information

Digital ID

lvc000011-449
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    location was selected by a group from a depositors insurance corporation from Washington who were not concerned with the growth of our city and that they could not care less if this was a traffic problem at this corner. She stated that she must take exception to Mr. Ham's suggestion that this would not complicate traffic and that it was her opinion that a drive-in bank would make it worse. His Honor Mayor Pro Tem Whipple asked if there were any other statements to be made and Mr. Perry stated that he was not familiar with the proceedings of this Board but that they had gotten along without this bank for many years and would like to get a postponement so people in the neighborhood could know what is happening. He stated that he was not at the first meeting of the Planning Commission as he did not under­stand the meaning of the tract letter he received and that it meant very little to him. He asked, if possible, to have a postponement of this rezoning. Mayor Pro Tem Whipple answered that he did not know of any great benefit to be derived from a postponement and that there had been considerable in the papers and much discussion about it. Commissioner Fountain added that there had been one public hearing and this matter had been before the Planning Commission on two occasions. Commissioner Fountain moved that the application of M. S. McCoy for the reclassification of property located at the northeast corner of West Charleston and Rancho Road from R-E to C-1 be approved subject to the following conditions, and City Attorney instructed to prepare the necessary ordinance amendment: 1. That the property be used strictly for the proposed use of a drive-in branch bank. 2. That the building conform to all City Ordinances and building codes including setbacks, landscaping, signs, traffic and parking facilities, etc. Commissioner Whipple stated that he would like to vacate the chair to his colleague, Commissioner Sharp. He commented that not very long ago there was an application for a service station on this comer and he believed they would continue to get applications for this property and that he could not help but think that a development of this type would be much more desirable than a service station. He further stated that perhaps this would be a solution at least to an end to this matter continually coming before the Board for rezoning for different purposes. He stated it was his opinion that this property would never be suitable for residential, for which it is now zoned, and that in a lot of these matters some feel they would be beneficial and some feel they would not. He added that there was not a full board present but this could not be helped due to resignations and elections; therefore, he stated that he would second the motion, and it was carried by the following vote: Commissioner Fountain and His Honor Mayor Pro Tem Whipple voting aye; noes, none. Commissioner Sharp stated that his firm has done business in the past for the Bank of Nevada and is doing this bank; therefore, he passed his vote. Absent: Mayor C. D. Baker. BID OPENING 59.23 This being the time heretofore set for the Bid Opening No. 59.23 for the Street Street Repair Contract Repair Contract (1959-60 Budget); bids were received as follows: Referred to Public Works H. W. Polk, General Contractor $ 19,335.00 Ideal Asphalt Paving Co., Inc. 16,372.00 Wells Cargo, Inc. 24,385.00 Commissioner Sharp moved that the above bids be referred to the City Manager and Director of Public Works for recommendation. Motion seconded by Commissioner Fountain and carried by the following vote: Commissioners Fountain, Sharp and His Honor Mayor Pro Tem Whipple voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Mayor C. D. Baker. BID OPENING 59.21) This being the time heretofore set for the Bid Opening No. 59.21) for the Paving of Paving St. Louis - 10th St. Louis - Curb and Gutter, Sidewalk and Street Lights from 10th Street to Maryland to Maryland Parkway Parkway (1958 - 59 Budget), bids were received as follows: Referred to Public Works Wells Cargo, Inc. $ 8,422.72 H. W. Polk, General Contractor 10,051).84 Ideal Asphalt Paving Co., Inc. 8,642.60 Commissioner Sharp moved that the above bids be referred to the City Manager and Director of Public Works for recommendation. Motion seconded by Commissioner Fountain and carried by the following vote: Commissioners Fountain, Sharp and His Honor Mayor Pro Tem Whipple voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Mayor C. D. Baker. BID OPENING 59.25 This being the time heretofore set for the Bid Opening No. 59.25 for Automatic Sprinkling System, Sprinkling System Adjacent to Hyde Park Pool, with Poly-Vinyl Chloride Pipe; Hyde Park Pool Alternate, Black Iron Pipe, Dipped and Wrapped (1958-59 Budget), bids were received as follows: Referred to Public Works Nevada Lawn Irrigation Co. #1 $ 5,639.65 #2 6,399.23 #3 4,479.63 Sprinkler Sales & Serv. Co. #1 4,051.47 #2 (No Bid) #3 4,051.47 Commissioner Fountain moved that the above bids be referred to the City Manager and Director of Public Works for recommendation. Motion seconded by Commissioner Sharp and carried by the following vote: Commissioners Fountain, Sharp and His Honor Mayor Pro Tem Whipple voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Mayor C. D. Baker. 6-3-59