Las Vegas City Commission Minutes, November 7, 1949 to May 21, 1952, lvc000007-14

Scherer, L. B, Pioneer Club - City 3150.00 1,477.98 2 thru 22 5 Bishop, Earl 335 So. Manhattan Los Angeles, California 300.00 140.76 23, 24 5 Prowitt, Clifford Box 1047 - City 150.00 70.38 25 5 Scherer, L. B. Pioneer Club - City 3,150.00 1,477.98 26 thru 41 5 Pruter, Roy General Delivery - City 300.00 140.76, 42, 43 5 Rapoport, Ethel 28 Fremont - City 300.00 140.76 47, 48 . . 5 BOULDER DAM HOMESITE #2 Guyton, J. F. & Mary 1206 Pellissier Bldg. Los Angeles, California 300.00 140,76 1,2 1 Stevens, B. A. & E. M. 704 Linden Avenue - City 300.00 140.76 47, 48 1 Parish, Dude & Leanora 223 South 6th - City 300.00 140.76 1, 2 2 Williams, Lena 2210 East 2nd Los Angeles 33, California 300.00 140.76 47, 48 2 Bateson, Arthur Room 7, Arimo Bldg Logan, Utah 300.00 140.76 1, 2 3 His Honor asked if there were any persons present who wished to object to this assessment. Mr. John Sulawske asked why there was a difference in the assessed values of the lots. Mr. Oglesby explained there were only three lots in this district that had not been raised in their assessed valuation by the Clark County Board of Equaliza­tion, and the property owners of these lots had appeared at the meeting of the Board of Equalization and objected to the raise. Mr. Emerson D. Williams said that he had not received notice of the meeting of the Board of Equalization, and therefore had no chance to attend this meeting. Mr. Henry L. Chretien asked how deep the sewer will go. He stated that if it is not at least feet deep he and others will not be able to connect. City Manager George O. Treem, checked this and said that it will be deep enough. Mr. James Smith and Mr. Joe Petty also complained that they had not received no­tification of the meeting of the Board of Equalization. His Honor told these people that there was nothing the Board of Commissioners could do about the lots that had not been raised in assessed valuation. This matter will have to be taken up with the Clark County Board of Equalization when they meet next July. Thereafter Commissioner Whipple moved the foregoing Assessment Roll #6-1949 be approved. Motion seconded by Commissioner Bunker and carried by the following vote: Commissioners Bunker, Whipple and His Honor voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Commissioners Moore and Peccole. An ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE DECURING THE DETERMINATION OF THE BOARD OF COMMIS­SIONERS OF THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, TO MAKE CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF US VEGAS BY INSTALLING A SANITARY SEWER IN THE SAID CITY; PROVIDING THAT THE COST AND EXPENSE THEREOF SHALL EE PAID ENTIRELY BY SPECIAL ASSESSMENT UPON ALL THE LOTS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT HEREBY ESTABLISHED ACCORDING TO THE BENEFITS; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO, was reported on favorably by Commissioner Bunker and thereafter read in full to the Board for the first time. Commissioner Bunker moved that the foregoing entitled ordinance be adopted0 Motion seconded by Commissioner Whipple and carried by the following vote: Commissioners Bunker, Whipple and His Honor voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Commissioners Moore and Peccole. An ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS, COUNTY OF CLARK, STATE OF NEVADA, CREATING AND ESTABLISHING CIVIL SERVICE RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OF SAID CITY, DEFINING TERMS; PROVIDING FOR EXAMINA­TIONS; ESTABLISHING ELIGIBILITY LISTS; PROVIDING FOR APPOINTMENTS; PROMOTIONS; DISCIP­LINARY ACTION; REPORTS AND RECORDS; CLASSIFICATION AND PAY PLANS, AND ALL MATTERS RE- LATING THERETO, was reported on favorably by Commissioner Whipple and read-in full to the Board for the first time. Commissioner Whipple moved the foregoing entitled ordinance be adopted. Motion seconded by Commissioner Bunker and carried by the following vote: Commissioners Bunker, Whipple and His Honor voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Commissioners Moore and Peccole. PROPOSED ORDINANCE Meadows Addn Sewer Assessment District #200-3 Ordinance No. 392 PROPOSED ORDINANCE Civil Service Rules Ordinance No. 391