Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Las Vegas City Commission Minutes, June 22, 1911 to February 7, 1922, lvc000001-244

Image

File
Download lvc000001-244.tif (image/tiff; 57.32 MB)

Information

Digital ID

lvc000001-244
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Las Vegas, Nevada for the seconding reading Whereupon motion of Commissioner Matzdorf and seconded by Commissioner Ullom and duly carried it was ordered that said Ordinance be and the same is hereby passed as appears more fully in Ordinance Book One under Ordinance No. 69, to which reference is hereby made, the vote upon said resolution being as follows towit; Commissioners Matzdorf aye, Ullom aye, and his honor the Mayor W.E. Hawkins voting aye, Nones None. At this time it was called to the attention of the Board of City Commissioners in and for said City by the Library Committee that one James C. Thomas who was a Member of said Library Committee had resigned from said Board and that said Board recommended the appointment of one George Hayes of the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, Whereupon motion of Commissioners Ullom and seconded by Commissioner Matzdorf and duly carried it was ordered that the said George Hayes be and is hereby appointed as a member of said Library committee until the further order of this Board. the Vote upon said resolution being as follows towit; Commissioners Matzdorf, aye, Ullom aye, and his honor the Mayor W.E. Hawkins voting aye. Noes None. Upon motion being duly made and carried it was ordered that this Board stand adjourned until Tuesday September 10th. 1917. Office of the City Clerk Las Vegas, Nevada Las Vegas, Nevada September 10-17 At a regular adjourned meeting of the Board of City Commissioners in and for the City of Las Vegas Nevada, held for the purpose of considering the revoking of the retail Liquor license of Henry E. Squires in said City, all Members of the Board Present, at this time upon the request of Richard Busteed counsel for the said Henry E. Squires it was ordered that this Board stand adjourned until Wednesday evening September 11th at 7:30 P.M. of said Day for the purpose of considering said license. The vote upon said resolution being as follows towit Commissioners Matzdorf, aye, Ullom aye, Ball aye, Elwell aye, and his honor the Mayor W.E. Hawkins voting aye. Office of the City Clerk Las Vegas Nev. September 11th, 1917. At a regular adjourned meeting of the Board of City Commissioners in and for the City of Las Vegas, Nevada Present Hon. W.E. Hawkins Mayor with Commissioners Matzdorf Ullom, Ball and Elwell with the City Clerk and City Attorney. This being the time set by the Board for the hearing of the quest inn of revoking the retail liquor license of Henry E. Squires, and the said Henry E. Squires being present with his counsel Richard Busteed, thereupon the Board proceeded to hear said Charges and testimony in the matter. Thereupon the Clerk read the Complaint to the said Henry E. Squires in full setting forth the fact to the said Henry E. Squires that this had been the time set to consider said matter, at this time Richard Busteed Counsel for the said H.E. Squires made a statement to the Board to effect that that the Board could not hear this matter upon the ground that the Board had no control oversaid matter and asked that said charge be dismissed , there upon said