Information
Digital ID
upr000152-031
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.% of the office force, including the housekeeper and rooming house attendants. The authorization to increase the 'wages of water serrioe repairmen and laborers gives m e some trouble. On M a r o h 9, 1950, Mr. Stoddard approved recommendation for authority to change classification and rates of p a y of the LYLfcWCo. labor force at Las Ve g a s contained in Mr. R e i n h a r d t ’s letter to h i m of February 24, 1950, a c o p y of w h i c h I enclose. The increases placed in effect for this class of labor of M a r c h 1, 1950 were separate and apart from the general increases in w a g e s wh i c h have b e e n granted from time to time to a l l of the employees of the Water Department at the time similar increases were granted to railroad employees. It seems t o m e that the increases of M a r c h 1, 1950 result from promotions and reclassifications w ithin the m e a n i n g of subparagraph (d) of Section 2 of R e g u lation Mo. 6 but before advising Mr. Reinhardt to this effect, % wo u l d like to k n o w if y o u agree. If the M a r o h 1st increases are so r e garded, all of the outside labor foroe referred to in Mr. R e i n h a r d t ’s letter of Ap r i l 10, 19,51 w i l l be entitled to 1 2 ^ an hour increase. In m y opinion, any increases granted should be mad e effective in the payroll period including Ap r i l 12, 1951. S. S. Bennett Enels. ECR:LW