Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 100-26 Public Hearing on Assessment Roll ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 100-27 Public Hearing on Assessment Roll BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said revised roll shall not increase any assessments heretofore shown on the original roll; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the revised roll shall be filed with the City Clerk on the 5th day of May, 1954. Motion seconded by Commissioner Jarrett and carried by the following vote: Commissioners Bunker, Jarrett, Sharp and His Honor Mayor Pro Tem Whipple voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Mayor Baker. The Mayor Pro Tem announced that this was the time and place designated for the Board of Commissioners of the City of Las Vegas, Nevada to meet and review the assessments and hear any objections to said assessments which may be made on the proposed improvements in Assessment District No. 100-26, as shown on Assessment Roll No. 31-1954. The Mayor Pro Tem then asked if any written objections concerning said assessment roll had been filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk answered there had been one objection filed in her office prior to said meeting. The Board of County Commissioners request that their property on Bridger Street from Second to Third be excluded. The Mayor Pro Tem then publicly asked if anyone desired to make any further objections, suggestions, comments or raise any questions concerning said special assessment roll. Mr. Gibson, Otto Westlake, Col. McCarthey, George Gremner, David Farnsworth, Rose Ullom and Nell Starr, who was represented by Mr. Gibson, appeared before the Board at this time in protest to this assessment roll. Thereafter Commissioner Sharp moved that the hearing on this Assessment Roll. No. 31-1954 be recessed until May 5, 1954, and the following resolution adopted: WHEREAS, the City of Las Vegas, and the officers thereof, have taken action to improve certain streets and parts of streets, therein, to be known as Assessment District No. 100-26; and WHEREAS, the said City has directed the preparation of an assessment roll; and WHEREAS, such assessment roll was filed on the 21st day of April, 1954 and WHEREAS, a public protest hearing was held on the 3rd day of May, 1954; and WHEREAS, the said roll needs to be corrected and revised before confirmation to correct typographical or clerical errors and to modify all assessments if the construction price proves to be substantially different than the estimate price. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the City of Las Vegas at a special meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of May, 1954, that the Ex-Officio City Assessor be, and he is hereby directed to revise the assessment roll heretofore filed to show the amount of assessments in the total of $250,000.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said revised roll shall not increase any assessments heretofore shown on the original roll; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the revised roll shall be filed with the City Clerk on the 5th day of May, 1954. Motion seconded by Commissioner Jarrett and carried by the following vote: Commissioners Bunker, Jarrett, Sharp and His Honor Mayor Pro Tem Whipple voting aye; noes, none. Absent: Mayor Baker. The Mayor Pro Tem announced that this was the time and place designated for the Board of Commissioners of the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, to meet and review the assessments and hear any objections to said assessments which may be made on the proposed improvements in Assessment District No. 100-27, as shown on Assessment Roll No. 32-1954. The Mayor Pro Tem then asked if any written objections concerning said assessment roll had been filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk answered there had been no objections filed in her office prior to said meeting. The Mayor Pro Tem then publicly asked if anyone desired to make any further objections, suggestions or comments, or raise any questions concerning said special assessment roll. There were no objections, suggestions or comments voiced. Thereafter Commissioner Sharp moved that the hearing on this Assessment Roll No. 32-1954 be recessed until May 5, 1954, and the following resolution adopted: WHEREAS, the City of Las Vegas, and the officers thereof, have taken action to improve certain streets and parts of streets, therein, to be known as Assessment District No. 100-27; and WHEREAS, the said City has directed the preparation of an assessment roll; and 5-3-54