Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000288 36

Image

File
Download upr000288-036.tif (image/tiff; 24.09 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000288-036
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. Win. Reinhardt; Los Angeles - August 25, 1950. 174-2 loss Mr. j.W. Bookes - Omaha Hr, W.H. Hulsizer - " Jf. Xour letter of August 22nd In connection with proposed hearing to be held by the Public Service Commission Upon request of the City of Las Vegas that the Commission require the Las Vegas land and Water Company to prooeed Immediately to augment the present water supply to the City of Las Vegas? I talked to Mr. Allard, President of the Commission, who stated he would have Mr. Shamberger at this hearing with the report heretofore prepared by Mr. Shamberger. He stated that he did not know whether the Commission would call Mr. Shamberger or not but assured me he would could call him. be present and we Mr. Allard further advised me that it was his reoolleotion that when Mr. Shamberger made a survey and later prepared his report, it was done In collaboration with a federal engineer who was making a state-wide survey of the water situation in Nevada; that he oould not at that moment recall his name but would secure It and send it to me. He thinks he Is a local Nevada man working for the federal government and it might be that you would desire to give consideration to his employ­ment since he was so closely associated with Mr. Shamberger In making out this report. If he is still available and is a local man, of course, he oould have ready access to all of the data the state has collected and having collaborated with Mtrh.a t Sohfam abner goeurt,s idhei s entgeisnteiemro.ny might hare more weight than With respect to the last paragraph of your letter, X wonder If you are referring to the subjeot discussed in my letter of August 17, 1949 to you, wherein X stated that under the general law, the Commission oould not order us to make any extravagent improvements where it oould be shown that we could not earn a reasonable return on suoh Investment or im­provements. If it is some other matter you have in mind, X would appreciate advice and if that is the matter you have in mhienadr,i ngi.t will, of course, be further briefed prior to the E. 1. Bennett EEB:AF