Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Letter from W. E. Rauch (Los Angeles) to C. H. Bloom, March 12, 1929

File

File
Download hln001112.tif (image/tiff; 24.14 MB)

Information

Creator

Creator: Rauch, W. E.

Date

1929-03-15

Description

Rauch sees no point in charging the present rate to new industrial connections to the railroad pipelines, but does feel that they should charge a flat rate for meter installation and house connections.

Digital ID

hln001112

Physical Identifier

Box 86 Folder 768.4 Las Vegas Water
Details

Citation

hln001112. Union Pacific Railroad Collection, 1828-1995. MS-00397. Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Las Vegas, Nevada. http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/d1rr1sm83

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at?special.collections@unlv.edu.

Standardized Rights Statement

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Digital Processing Note

Manual transcription

Language

English

Format

application/pdf

Water service - Industrial District - Las Vegas Los Angeles - March 12, 1929 File X-13- 657 Mr. C. H. Bloom: Referring to Mr. Strong's letter of March 9th and our subsequent conversation concerning water installation at Las Vegas: I see no reason for changing the present rate paid by the industries at that point, i. e., 15% per 1,000 gallons, with minimum of $2.50 per month, but do feel that we should establish a flat charge for meter installation and house connections, so that when we are negotiating a lease we can tell the proposed lessee what the expense of water installation will be. If you agree with this, would appreciate your further advice. cc Mr. Frank Strong