Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
Member of
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Ur* W* &• Rouse a December 21, 1951 feliftis it s t a r i f f charge#. -lection 6115 o f the ffsw&da Compiled Lews doss provide « » follow s* * nothing is. th is it‘t i shall be ©oast rood to prevent concent r«t:ton, commodity, tra n sit and other special contract ra tes, but e l l such rates sh ell be open to a l l shippers o f a lik e kind o f t r a ffic under sim ilar circumsbences end eondi-tloAft. and sh ell bo subject to the provisions o f th is set is to the printin g and f i l i n g o f the ? «e $ provided, a l l such rates shell fee un-dor the suporvis'i'on end r e g u la t io n ©f the comm ission.* This appears to relate prim arily to transportation, but i f i t does re la te to water u t i l it i e s , I do not believe that the Public Service 5©m«ieti©n would approve a spec ia l contract rate with the Railroad Company at cost* 1 think %k& p ractical d iffic u lt ie s ' involved would be increased at the time the water distrib u tion company was sold to the La® ?cga# later U t ilit y D is tric t or other public body-which Slight distribu te water t© the e ltis tn s of Las % §iju 1 believe that a ll concerned hope that the distrib u tion company w ill eventually be taken over by s public body and fo r that rersen X believe I t is desirable fo r the it ilr e a d to develop it® own separate supply i f i t le possible to do so* A f t I have already sta ted, ny view# are purely ten tative and 1 w ill give further consideration to the suggestion* contained in your le t t e r and m asking Ur. Cory be do so In the lig h t o f the Nevada law. The 5 « ill-end does own a water well in the shop grounds « t left Vsgaft which is separate and apart from the well# located in the water f i e l d . I t is my understanding that none o f the water from th is w ell is delivered to the Las Teges land end cater "oafany. X a lec understand that the present production from th is w ell is lim ited , but i t may fee t h a t th is w all could he reconstitu ted »© that i t would be able to produce a l l ©f t h e jiftilroed requirements. Since th is w ell is sepercte from those located in the water f ie ld , i t w ill undoubtedly ? not fee conveyed to the d istrib u tion .company or to any public body distrib u tin g water In Las fsgas. I t was d r ille d in 1921, but no appropriation was ever made on