Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000197 69

Image

File
Download upr000197-069.tif (image/tiff; 27.45 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000197-069
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Ur* W* &• Rouse a December 21, 1951 feliftis it s t a r i f f charge#. -lection 6115 o f the ffsw&da Com­piled Lews doss provide « » follow s* * nothing is. th is it‘t i shall be ©oast rood to prevent concent r«t:ton, commodity, tra n sit and other special contract ra tes, but e l l such rates sh ell be open to a l l shippers o f a lik e kind o f t r a ffic under sim ilar circumsbences end eondi-tloAft. and sh ell bo subject to the provisions o f th is set is to the printin g and f i l i n g o f the ? «e $ provided, a l l such rates shell fee un-dor the suporvis'i'on end r e g u la t io n ©f the com­m ission.* This appears to relate prim arily to transportation, but i f i t does re la te to water u t i l it i e s , I do not believe that the Public Service 5©m«ieti©n would approve a spe­c ia l contract rate with the Railroad Company at cost* 1 think %k& p ractical d iffic u lt ie s ' involved would be in­creased at the time the water distrib u tion company was sold to the La® ?cga# later U t ilit y D is tric t or other public body-which Slight distribu te water t© the e ltis tn s of Las % §iju 1 believe that a ll concerned hope that the distrib u tion company w ill eventually be taken over by s public body and fo r that rersen X believe I t is de­sirable fo r the it ilr e a d to develop it® own separate sup­ply i f i t le possible to do so* A f t I have already sta t­ed, ny view# are purely ten tative and 1 w ill give further consideration to the suggestion* contained in your le t t e r and m asking Ur. Cory be do so In the lig h t o f the Ne­vada law. The 5 « ill-end does own a water well in the shop grounds « t left Vsgaft which is separate and apart from the well# located in the water f i e l d . I t is my under­standing that none o f the water from th is w ell is de­livered to the Las Teges land end cater "oafany. X a l­ec understand that the present production from th is w ell is lim ited , but i t may fee t h a t th is w all could he recon­stitu ted »© that i t would be able to produce a l l ©f t h e jiftilroed requirements. Since th is w ell is sepercte from those located in the water f ie ld , i t w ill undoubtedly ? not fee conveyed to the d istrib u tion .company or to any public body distrib u tin g water In Las fsgas. I t was d r ille d in 1921, but no appropriation was ever made on