upr000095 23

% 5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Ml n VALLEY «AIS8 ftlSTMICY MlIIslXlII WHiMAS, the City of La# Yoga# has roguastofl tho t^io* Pacific Railroad Company and the Lo# htgelea & Salt Sato; yWgl Company for m easement for roadway purposes along, aoress, utiimr the South fifty (9®) foot of the Soathoast qaarter CJgt) of Seolion 31. Township SO South, -''nog* #1 last, in the City of Lao Vegas, Clark County, levadas and WSSRSAS, said easement area i# included is Subdivision? > •A* of Section 1 of the formal proposal siOsmittod hy the Ms Vegas Valley Water Bistrlot to the Wuioo Pacific Cojfaij, Loo Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company and Las Vegas Land and Water Company dated January 81st, 1»S3* , -/iit, ybkrsfm, it is m$mr k&solveb* that the Las Vegas Valley later sustriet dees not object to the granting of an mmmmt for roadway purposes to the City of las Vegas, along, across, through end ever tho South fifty CSC) foot of the Southeast gwarler (Mf> of See- tioa 31, Township 3© South, flange SI last, In tho City of Las Vegas, Clark County, lerada, hnd in tho event such an easement is granted it sill not he deemed to affect the aforesaid pro­posal of the Las Vegas Valley later district Sated January 31, 1« eaoept as It my reduo^ the mf acres, mere or less, provided in Job- j division *A* of Section 1 of said proposal, J 11 If amism* that the undersigned, the duly elected, Qualified acting Secretary of the Ms Yogas valley Water JW*. Iriot does hereby certify and attest that the foregoing is a if**# and correct copy of a certain resolution duly adopted by the heard of »irooters of sold district at a meting regularly held an the dav of ......... Ami, aid dee# hereby further cer- tITytSt said resolution has®et bom rescinded,, cancelled or annulled. 2K mmss wmmm t have hereunto set say hard and affixed the seal of said district this ......„__Jay of ...... .... 1083. viarmti