man000176 45

H. W.O’MELtfENY !8iB5-l94l ft LOUIS.W. M Y ^ S MAYNARD J.T O LL JOHN O’MELVENY-, JACKSON W. CHANCE PAUL FUSSELL JAMES M. IRVINE, JR . WILLIAM W. CLARY SIDNEY H- WALL HARRY L. DUNN RICHARD C. BERGEN JAMES L.BEEBE WILLIAM P. MARTIN PIERCE WORKS DEANE F. JOHNSON HOMER I. MITCHELL RAY H. LINDMAN CLINTON LATOURRETTE JAMES C.GREENE GRAHAM L.STER LIN G,JR . WILLIAM W.ALSUP W. B. CARMAN LAW O F F I C E S O F O ’ M E L V E N Y <5c M Y E R S •433 S O U T H S P R I N G S T R E E T L O S A N G E L E S 13 JOHN A. POWELL FREDERICK N. EDWARDS ADRIAN C . STANTON LAUREN M. WRIGHT RODNEY K- POTTER PHILIP A. LOOMIS, JR - GEORGE F. ELMENDORF ROBERT W. LEWIS RUTH ANN SAYLES HOWARD J. DEARDS EDWARD C. FREUTEL,JR. FRANKLIN T. HAMILTON JAMES E. DUNLAP PHILIP F. WESTBROOK,JR. HUGH L.MACNEIL CLYDE E.TR ITT ERNEST M. CLARK, JR . EVERETT B.CLARY BENNETT W. PRIEST JAMES E.CROSS E.HARLEY WALTHER JAMES W. BEEBE RICHARD B.RAGLAND WARREN M. CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM E.W ILEY,JR. RICHARD F. IGL ROY E. POTTS ROGER WILLIAMS R.BRADBURY CLARK GILBERT E. HAAKH WENDELL B. WILL WILLIAM L.SCOTT EDWARD B. SMITH,DX June 17t h 1 9 5 3 6 9 2 0 S U N S E T BO ULEV ARD HOL LYWOOD 2 8 GABLE ADDRESS"MOMS” IN R E P L Y R E F E R T O B-2805 S U B J E C T LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Mr. Spencer L. Butterfield Vice President, Las Vegas Valley Water District Bank of Nevada Las Vegas, Nevada Dear Mr* Butterfield: We have receiv Pacific, which letter sideratlon a copy of a: Commission of Nevada, concern the exten Wa t e r Company to' the-^Ch further advisees J nat the a petition wl Mr. Bennett of Union er District for its c o n ­ovae r of the Public Service 53* Said opinion and order ice by the Las Vegas Land and ights Subdivision. Mr. Bennett ompany contemplates the filing of Ion for a rehearing. In deheral, tbfe/Commission finds that sufficient water is available f ^ r v ^ h e s d n / i c e of the applicant, that the Water Company has a l^g^lPo^ilgatlon to make the extension and render the service, and tHat any capital expenditures made by the Water Company under Rule 9 should be added to the total figure evidenced in the Agreement wi t h the Las Vegas Valley Wa t e r District. An order in accordance with said opinion was entered directing c o n ­struction of the extension pursuant to Rule 9. Rule 9 requires the applicant for water service to advance to the Company sufficient money to cover the cost of the extension, and provides for refund to the applicant at the rate of 35# of the revenues for 10 years or until full payment is made. Under the contract of June 1, 1953* between Union Pacific and the Wa t e r Gompany and the District, the effect of the Public Service C o m m i s s i o n ’s order will be as follows: Pursuant to Section 9(a)(b) and/or (c), the cost of the Charleston Heights extension