Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
September 25th, 193S* Honorable Robert t* Allen, Chairman Public Service Commission of Kev&da, Carson City, Nevada, Bern* Mr, Chairman* lie* Las Vegas band and Hater Company vs* Public Service Commission, Case He, 18845, With reference to the above entitled matter, and the judgment of the court made and entered on the 15th day of September, 1952, when I was In Carson City, please be advised that the Las Vegas Land and Water Company has determined not to appeal from the judgment of the court, Mr, heinhardt, Vice President of the Los Vegas Land and Water Company, has reached his dec!slim net to take an appeal in this matter in the interest of harmony and cooperation, Although there are some statements in the opinion of the Comission as submitted to the court with which the company takes issue, it is net our desire to explain, elaborate upon or question these statements before the supreme Court on appeal, Esther, it is eur desire to cooperate with the Commission in every respect to asoertain the effect of the orders of the Coeaaission of August 24th, 1951 and August 13th, 1952, We recognise that in the event the orders above referred to do not pro- duce the anticipated revenues to which the company is entitled, we will receive further consideration by tike Commission through appropriate steps to effect a new tariff, In'that regard, the company has heretofore furnished to the Cojssaission a proposed rate schedule based upon the orders of the Ccmaaission of August 24th, 1951, and August 13th, 1952, How that the judgment of the court has formally affirmed these orders and has authorised «jMt\ directed the Coevals » ion to increase the water rates as provided in the orders of the Cossaission. I trust the Cowis- sion will now be able to approve the tariff heretofore \ i,; submitted effective for the September, 1953, billing ah '? provided in the order- of August 13th, 1952, W.f j| ?