Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000282 227

Image

File
Download upr000282-227.tif (image/tiff; 26.85 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000282-227
Details

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

September 25th, 193S* Honorable Robert t* Allen, Chairman Public Service Commission of Kev&da, Carson City, Nevada, Bern* Mr, Chairman* lie* Las Vegas band and Hater Company vs* Public Service Commission, Case He, 18845, With reference to the above entitled matter, and the judgment of the court made and entered on the 15th day of September, 1952, when I was In Carson City, please be advised that the Las Vegas Land and Water Company has determined not to appeal from the judgment of the court, Mr, heinhardt, Vice President of the Los Vegas Land and Water Company, has reached his dec!slim net to take an appeal in this matter in the interest of harmony and cooperation, Although there are some statements in the opinion of the Comission as submitted to the court with which the company takes issue, it is net our desire to explain, elaborate upon or question these statements before the supreme Court on appeal, Esther, it is eur desire to cooperate with the Commission in every respect to asoertain the effect of the orders of the Coeaaission of August 24th, 1951 and August 13th, 1952, We recognise that in the event the orders above referred to do not pro- duce the anticipated revenues to which the company is en­titled, we will receive further consideration by tike Com­mission through appropriate steps to effect a new tariff, In'that regard, the company has heretofore fur­nished to the Cojssaission a proposed rate schedule based upon the orders of the Ccmaaission of August 24th, 1951, and August 13th, 1952, How that the judgment of the court has formally affirmed these orders and has authorised «jMt\ directed the Coevals » ion to increase the water rates as pro­vided in the orders of the Cossaission. I trust the Cowis- sion will now be able to approve the tariff heretofore \ i,; submitted effective for the September, 1953, billing ah '? provided in the order- of August 13th, 1952, W.f j| ?