UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
% \ H. E.D APR 12 1943 LOS ANGELES, April 10, 1943 / Mr. 0. L. Hall: Supplementing my letter of today In connection with proposed meeting with Commissioner Sexton to consider LVLAW annual report. As you know, this question was brought up at a hearing held in Las Vegas in August, 1941, and an adjourned hearing held in September, 1941. Z am handing you herewith transcript of testimony in that case, together with certain pertinent exhibits, drawing your attention to the testimony of Mr. Mann at the first hearing and the testimony given by Mr. Mann and others at the second hearing. Mr. Sexton's chief difficulty seeme to be to reconcile the annual report filed by the Water Company with the annual report filed by the Union Pacific Railroad. Maybe a review of Mr. Mann's testimony will help you in oonneotlon with our proposed meeting. XSBibrh X, X. Bennett enol.
