Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Letter from William Hood to J. Ross Clark, January 29, 1905

Image

File
Download snv002403.tif (image/tiff; 24.8 MB)

Information

Creator

Creator: Hood, William

Date

1905-01-29

Description

Letter discusses planning of blocks in the Las Vegas townsite.

Digital ID

snv002403

Physical Identifier

97 19--File 139C
Details

Citation

snv002403. Union Pacific Railroad Collection. Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Las Vegas, Nevada. http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/d1jw87251

Rights

This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

Standardized Rights Statement

Digital Provenance

Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

Date Digitized

2009-03-26

Language

English

Publisher

University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

Format

image/tiff

San Francisco, Cal., January 29th, 1905 SUBJECT: Las Vegas townsite. Mr. J. Ross Clark, Second Vice President, San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake R. R. Co. Dear Sir: I telegraphed Mr. E. G. Tilton, January 28th, as follows, in your absence which I hope you will approve of, this having been done after consultation with Mr. W. H. Bancroft: "Your letter twenty-seventh with plat Las Vegas townsite. Mr. Bancroft and myself think you had best make reservation on left four hundred feet throughout instead of as heretofore decided on and omit blocks one, two and three, these blocks being four hundred by one hundred and twenty feet. Show this telegram to Mr. Gibbon and advise if he agrees. In any case you could lay out such part of the townsite as Mr. Gibbon thinks best as at present planned, omitting blocks one, two and three and omitting them from any map of townsite that is filed. Answer." You will notice that this still leaves the question of whetherto omit blocks 1, 2, and 3 from the townsite for decision by the Committeeand enables the work of laying out the townsite to go on without delay. Yours respectfully, William Hood. CC - Mr. W. H. Bancroft.