Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
2 0 - ti HFC 26 1952 m t * W. U * ffcilsiserj (OC-Mr* A# 1* Stoddard Mr* W. H« House Mr* S» K* Bennett g? c2 R, JAN "611953 Decembe] 704~$3 • File iPI * * 2180 ? « 33*18} 2 3, 1952- I I , B S i~. a . M D2E6C VV ' 1A9on5 2A HI ?/ fhis refers to the proposed sale of the enter fuel11- ties at Ids Vegas, Nevada to the has Vegas valley Water Bis- triot, your file 3703*1* In order to More actually estimate the tarn offset on the sale basis considered in coatareas© in Mr.Rouse's offine on Beocud>er 16, 1956, additional Information is required as referred to hereinafter. We hare been furnished separation of the appraised values of the eater plant by Mr. Stoddard as follows} Appraised by Union Pacific #1,299,522 water Biatriot (original) 1,099,003 * • (revised) 1,130,545 In accordance with your letter of December 17, 1932 to Mr* Stoddard, Onion Pacific appraisal does not include the SB? acres of iM s Q h water bearing lends valued at <^267,650. Also, as 1 understand the appraisal summary dated August 3,1952, the value of the lands is not included in either of the above Water District's appraisals* Will you please confirm this let-tar understanding* It is also noted that the summary shows additions and betterments have been included in the appraisals only to May 1, 1938* I n order to place the appraisal figures on a comparable basis with paragraph (e) of the later District's offer of August 23, 1938, the additions and betterments Included in the appraisals Should be brought deem to September 1, 1958* later on when de-termini^ the actual tax effect on the sale, it will be necessary to again revise the additions and betterments included in the appraisals, to the date of sale* Xt is further noted that the value of the automotive, shop and other equipment is not included in any of the appraisals* As stated in ay letter of December 17, 1958 to is r. Bennett, copy to you, the booh value of such facilities at December 1, 1938 was #12,111.3?* Depreciation has been accrued on this cost to September 1, 1952 in the amount of #4,394.06* since the water Blstrict's offer1 in paragraph §g§: includes these facilities, the value thereof should be included in your revised appraisals* I M B J f c S a * X P J S il #1,348,404 #8,641,983 1,063,347 8,168,350 1,873,940 2,403,363