UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
Los Angeles, January 29* 1953 80-12 Mr. Wm. Reinhardts Mr. Bennett says that you desire a memorandum as to the status of the proposal to transfer the water production facilities of the Railroad at Las Vegas to the LVL& WCompany. This was first suggested in your letter to Mr.Stoddard of December 4, 1951* and was temporarily sidetracked I believe, because of Mr. Hulsizer's alternative proposal that a donation of the entire water system at Las Vegas be made to the District. The proposal was again revived in your letter to Mr. Stoddard of September 30, 1952. In December, 1952, I was called to Omaha to discuss the matter with the various Interested officials. Attached is a copy of the memorandum made on December 16, 1952, following the conference. You will note that a definite conclusion was not reached, but that it was tentatively thought that the transfer should be made. The final conclusion was to be reached after Mr, Bachman had had a final opinion from Mr. Sutton as to the tax consequences. I do not know what ha# finally been decided. I believe the matter now rests with either Mr. Sutton or Mr. Bachman or both. SCRsMSB Enel. Edward C. Renwlck
