Image
Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
H L o s A n g e l e s , M a rch 7 , 1 9 5 1 MEMORANDUM: R • L , A • Referring to your letter to Mr, Jopling Sated March 5, 1951, and Mr. Roy A, Wehe*s memorandum to you dated March 2, 1951, with regard to charge against the LVL&W for electrie energy reported used in operation of water facilities at Las Vegas, Nevada. Mr. Jopling ©ailed this morning regarding the above and since you were not in the office I took the liberty of discussing the matter referred to with him. Mr. Jopling states that all of the electric energy used in the water field, including booster pumps, wells, ete., and all other water facilities, at the present time is metered through meters Installed April, 1948, at the substation near the Shop Grounds. These meters show energy used exclusively in the water producing facilities. Mr. Jopling states that Water Service Department started reading these meters in F eb ru a ry , 1950, and that charges reported for electric energy used through these meters is accurate subsequent to February, 1950. Between February, 1950, and April, 1948, the meters were read by the Mechanical Department and he is of the opinion that the amount charged against the Water Company vas Inaccurate, due to the fact that the split of the total power bill was made on a purely arbitrary basis whereas since February, 1950, the amount charged to the LVL&WCo. was based on a prorate of the power through all the Railroad Company* s electric meters as applied to the total power shown in bill as submitted by the Power Company. Mr. Jopling states that he has a total of 7 meters receiving power billed by the Power Company and also has a totalising meter which checks very olosely the sum of the 7 individual meters, Mr. Jopling states for some time past the Power Company*s bill has shown considerable less power than the total of power used as indicated by the Railroad Company*s meters. He took this matter up with the Power Company and advised them that their bill seemed to be considerable under what it should be based on Railroad Company*s meters, and that he had made a check of the Railroad Company's rasters to determine that they were all operating accurately. The Power Company told him that while their bill seemed to indicate an undercharge still they were satisfied that the amount being billed was adequate.