Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
Iltattm* (Mil? Stuutrancf mb ©rust Hspmjiqtuj the Bepiat of Grandview Mditibaj thence Easterly & m g said Korth line to the dolat of beginning. Said condemnation order retention of easements heretofore gw xietiag Xtma owned by the Las Vegas 3 8. Linas crossing tract and Lots L6o atsn dj 7 t *i ooff GSrhainndrvtieevw Addition, t&e only Instrument of record is an assignment fro® the Grandview Plater Oca^any, Inc. “feu the Las- Vegae Lent and , Hater Company conveying the lines and the certificate of public conveyance, which iastrsasent was recorded «3bly w 19*& as Document Ho. 18*0.03, Clark County, Hevada records. 9 . Line located la the alley in Hock IS of Bucks Subdivision between Mesquite Avenue and Hinth Street* This alley was vacated by Order of City Camiesioners which crier was recorded Hoveaber 11, 19^5 as Document Ho. 207333# Clark County, Bevada records. These is a mention made that retention of easements for ptblic utilities was recommended by the Planning Commission# however, the order does not recite that such easements are to be retained. Therefore, the effect of the order as to the retention of existing easements is questionable. May 9* 1953 Hcarthmsterly along the center of the alley so described to the S aid Block Hi thence Sdrthwester orth line of Block 11 to the ce leventh Street; thenee along a cm? to an intersection with the Hart view Tract, the same being the South line of the Replat of Grandview Addition | rsection is approximately- 2 ota the Southeast corner of Lot 5 Replat of Grand view Addition; oag the South line of the Rep ddition to the Bast line of Te ? northerly along the last line of Tenth Street to the Hearth line of Section 35# the pane beiag-ithe Hoarth line of Repl&t Mditikm; along Horth dolnt