Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000047 153

Image

File
Download upr000047-153.tif (image/tiff; 23.52 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000047-153
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Water Supply - Facilities famished by IA&SXiS las Vegas, Bemda, Aprll 11, 1933. I 23-3-3 Hr. F* H. 2nicl?er bo ofcer, - -General Manager, Loe Angeles, California. %ar Sirs d'e are in receipt of statement from Hr, Barry showing Basis of rental rate on joint facilities for the year 1933, copy of which is attached for yoor information. When the. contrsot under which m ore now oper­ating, dated April 1, 1929, was placed in effect, the *«ster company paid 60 per pent of the onnasl operating and carry­ing charges, or #975.00 per month{#11,700 per year). « the time this contract was drawn, it wee necessary to sup­port oar request to the ablio Utilities Gommieeion of Nev­ada for on increase in water rates, hot since its original draft its rental rate has -increased each year until our rate for the year 1933 is #1567,49 per month (#18,809.88 per year JfW^1 1 v Jw'* ? ,.p The cease of this increase is that the total oper­ating end carrying chargee hare increased 28.41 per cent sad at the seme time our proportion of the charges has Increased from 60 per coat to 75.12 per cent, according to the amount of water consumed. Regarding the Inorease in the total operating tend carrying charges, vre note that the maintenance and operating charge for 1932 is the same as for 1931, that is #4200.00*. while there wss e smell expense in connection with clearing the weeds and minor repair work after a fire during the year 1932, the '*©ter company performed about as much of the main-