UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries
Transcription
PERSONAL October 27, 8 0 -11 Mr. Thomas A. Campbell 135 South 4th Street Las Vegas, Nevada Dear Tom: I very much appreciate receipt of the News Release of the Water District dated October 25th, and I am wondering If I might be considered an editor, as the footnote indicates, so that I could receive a copy of the opinions of Mr. McNamee and the O'Melveny firm. As you know, I had always felt that the District would have to have either legislation or litigation to settle this question of meters, although I had never made any legal studies of the situation, my opinion being based on the reading of the statute itself. I am, therefore, particularly interested in what Mr. McNamee and the O'Melveny firm had to say, and if there are any extra copies of these opinions available, I would appreciate copies if you think I am entitled thereto. Yours very truly, E. E. Bennett 1 9 5 5 V EEB:ps
