Information
Digital ID
upr000177-393
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Hr* Hsu Jtttafeavtlf C oo Mr« su s . M m f t h e * • Maureb $, 1950 * 23-6 In % m n s s x # m * with you* tolopiion# rsqnest £ enclose An analysis of 3ta*f§at to Aoommt 30-2 eororing Ifg.intename #f PisirllMtiag 1 M % # 19^9* separating ’behvmn Material from MOil, trunk 'Jxperoe, bocal ?urob«A Material* and HlsbellaiMMHSS* ¥® have also * h m m on this study tho ohargos Foma f for ptxjppmm of oomparison. Generally otnhe A?«Ut©r,« differences appear to be au# to tii# math, la which vouchers art r 1*51 a ^erSvi* IMOS'S received s.n th# off! 043 af tar the 15tfa are r«glat-or-fcd in the ©yrrsnt month mm% though iss$trli&l a«y liar# bean received. in the previous month* Is completAea winlolo nm ais'l oyuoru a ana lsyismiisl aorf sCtiatteermgeenat .to *General gsswtB®**