Copyright & Fair-use Agreement
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Information
Digital ID
Permalink
Details
More Info
Rights
Digital Provenance
Publisher
Transcription
He also knew that there had become effective on April 1, 1951 a 10% increase in wages and that in 1951 there would be a replacement of a 4-inch main by 6-inch and 8-inch mains on Tenth and Stewart Streets which would involve an operating expense charge of $7,500.00, of which, in order to be conservative,, he assigned to 1951 only $2,500.00. In estimating $36,000.00 as the operation and maintenance expense of the Water Company rather than $41,200.00, the Commission has disregarded entirely the undisputed testimony as to the added expenses which will be incurred in the latter part of the year 1951. In Exhibit Q, witness Wehe estimated the Las Yegas office administrative and general expense to be $36,340.00. * His testimony (June Tr. 54 to 57) shows that this estimate was based upon the experience of the first four months of 1951 and that it was very conservatively made. The Commission’s opinion disregards this evidence and uses the earlier estimate contained in Exhibit B from which it arbitrarily deducts $5,000.00, all without explanation. Without stating reasons, the Commissi on also made certain adjustments upward or downward in other portions of the administrative and general expenses which differ from those shown in Exhibit Q,. The overall result is that the Commission’s estimate of $42,900.00 as compared with the estimate of $52,340.00 contained in Exhibit Q, understates administrative and general expenses $9,440.00. When that amount is -6 4 -