Information
Digital ID
upr000137-027
UNLV Special Collections provides copies of materials to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Material not in the public domain may be used according to fair use of copyrighted materials as defined by copyright law. Please cite us.
Please note that UNLV may not own the copyright to these materials and cannot provide permission to publish or distribute materials when UNLV is not the copyright holder. The user is solely responsible for determining the copyright status of materials and obtaining permission to use material from the copyright holder and for determining whether any permissions relating to any other rights are necessary for the intended use, and for obtaining all required permissions beyond that allowed by fair use.
Read more about our reproduction and use policy.
I agree.Los Angeles - May 5th, l^tyj 1 - 7 3 3 ^ Mr. E. E. Bennett: 1 (GO - Mr. W. R. Bracken Mr. Leo A. McNamee) Referring to Mr. McNamee'e letter May 2nd In connection with application by Robert B. Griffith for appropriation of water adjacent to our water producing field at Las Vegas. I have always felt that our position in making this protest is an untenable one. If the statutes of Nevada recognized municipal use as of highest beneficial use, we would have some grounds for maintaining our position. However, I understand from Mr. MoNamee that this is not the case. and Bracken to discuss with Mr. Ryland Taylor and Mr. Griffith the suggestion made by State Engineer Alfred M. Smith in his letter of March that the Water Go. furnish Griffith water for his subdivision development at wholesale rates, but in any event I think the importance of Well No. 11 to our project is such that we should withdraw the protest. I think it would be well for Messrs. McNamee