Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000092 36

Image

File
Download upr000092-036.tif (image/tiff; 27.02 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000092-036
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. Reinhardt a. June 25, 1952 and the Water District divided to shew separately repro­duction ©eats new and reproduction costs new lesa depre­ciation, together with a suwaary showing a consolidation of the results developed by the two appraisals and the differences in value arrived at therein* This stannary also shows the total investment cost plus overhead per­centages of all additions and betterments wade to both tho water production facilities and water distribution facilities for tho period, January 1, 1951, to May 1, 1952, I have also added the estimated cost, plus over­head percentages, of all service connections made by the Water Company during the same period* The amounts shown in this summary do not include the following items1 (1} Value of land and water rights. (2) Value of automotive shop and other equipment* f|| Value of material and supplies on hand* i k ) Going concern value* I am also attaching hereto a aaparato statement show­ing notes to accompany the three-page statement dated June 1C, 1952, which will explain in some detail the reasons for the differences in the amounts arrived at in the two sets of appraisals* L. R. Maag