Skip to main content

Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000132 183

Image

File
Download upr000132-183.tif (image/tiff; 27.54 MB)

Information

Digital ID

upr000132-183
    Details

    Rights

    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.

    Digital Provenance

    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room

    Publisher

    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    S I X T H E C O S T O F D E F E N S E A recent study by the T a x Foundation o f N e w Y o r k City, entitled, "S om e Aspects o f D efense Financing,” and published in the A u g u st issue o f T h e T a x R eview , brings out some pertinent facts about w hat is h appening n o w and w h at w e can expect in the future as a result o f our defense effort. W h a t our defense effort really means can be brough t out forceably by a fe w quotations from this study. " A t the end o f M a y , the national defense b ill o f the U n ited States fo r the' fiscal year 1942 w as placed at $15.5 billio n by the Bureau o f the B udget. A fe w days later the D epu ty D irector o f the Office o f Production M anagem ent stated that the U n ited States w ill have to spend at least $100 billio n to match the G erm an w a r machine. T h e same o f ­ficial estimated that a successful consummation o f the w ar effort w o u ld require the allocation o f 25 per cent o f the national income to defense production fo r an indefinite p eriod.” T h e study points out that these figures at best are on ly tem porarily valid, since no one can foresee fo r lo n g w hat w ill really happen in the present w ar. H ow ever, the study uses these official figures to show the effect on our economy. "V ie w e d in the ligh t o f the nation’s experi­ence, the statement that national defense w ill require 25 per cent o f the national income can be best described as staggering. In the first fu ll year o f the defense p rogram — fiscal year 1 9 4 l= -n atio n al defense expenditures o f $6 b il­lion equalled 7 per cent or 8 per cent o f the national income, com pared w ith a figure o f 2.2 per cent fo r the fiscal year 1940. T h e allocation o f 25 per cent o f the na­tional income to defense purposes w o u ld im ply— rou gh ly— • a relative increase o f 200 per cent above the fiscal year 1941. B y w ay o f comparison, in recent years governm ental expen­ditures fo r all purposes have been equivalent to m ore than 25 per cent o f the national income, w h ile tax collections have averaged above 20 per cent o f the national income. "T h e se data suggest that in the immediate future the de­fense effort w ill be a factor in the economy rou gh ly as im portant as all public expenditures p rior to the inception o f the defense pro gram — resulting in an extremely heavy bu rden u pon the economy.” Lest these figures become too alarm ing to people, w e quote further to sh ow the w a r effort bein g put forth by the U n ited K in g d o m and Germ any. " . . . in Decem ber, 1940, the D epartm ent o f Commerce reported that in the U n ited K in g d o m w a r expenditures w ere at a rate equal to 50 per cent o f the national income. In M arch , 1941, the D e p a rt­m ent o f Com m erce reported that in the early m onths o f this year the w a r expenditures o f G erm any w ere ru nning at a rate o f 72 b illio n marks a year, or 72 per cent o f an estimated national income o f 100 billio n marks. It was stated that a com parable rate o f expenditure w o u ld mean annual defense expenditures o f $57.6 billio n fo r the U n ited States. T h e latter figure w as based on an estimated national income o f $80 b illio n .” T h e Departm ent o f Com m erce figure o f $57.6 billio n annual defense expenditures fo r the U n ited States assumes that the U n ited States w o u ld be m atching G erm an y’s w a r expenditures alone, w ithout the U n ited K in gd om , and that 72 per cent o f our national income w o u ld only produce as much w a r m aterial as the 72 per cent o f G erm any’s na­tional income. T h e study points out that the rising national income w ill be an im portant factor in h elpin g to carry this added bu r­den o f governm ental expenditures fo r defense. H o w ev er, it goes on to say that: " I t w o u ld , o f course, be completely erroneous to assume that a defense effort as large as that in which the U n ited States is n ow engaged could be financed w ithout any real sacrifices. In the past year a large sector o f the public has apparently believed that the additional burdens they w ill be asked to bear w ill be relatively small. T o some extent this attitude has been encouraged by those responsible fo r the form ulation o f defense policy. A lth o u g h savings fo r defense purposes are bein g encouraged am ong all groups, the federal tax burden on the lo w er income groups m ay not be m aterially increased.” In com m enting on the current intentions o f the federal governm ent in financing defese and other governm ental expenditures, the study points out that: " W i t h the na­tional income at a h igh level and tending to increase, it is theoretically possible to cover the 1942 tax b ill— federal, state and local— o f $18 billion or m ore and m ake avail­able an additional $10 billion fo r defense purposes on a loan basis. But actual achievement o f this g o a l w ill re­quire careful fiscal plan n in g and continuous reiteration o f the im portance o f saving in the interest o f defense. In particular, it w ill be necessary to abandon the idea that the defense effort can be adequately financed w ithout direct tax contributions and savings on the part o f large segments o f the population. "In tegration o f tax and b o rro w in g program s is essential, if the defense effort is to be carried through w ith a m ini­m um o f friction throughout the economy. D isp rop ortion ­ate tax increases on income brackets that norm ally account fo r a large part o f all savings w o u ld , fo r exam ple, tend to decrease the savings available fo r the purchase o f savings bonds. A w id e as W ell as an equitable distribution o f the additional tax burden w o u ld appear to be necessary in order to insure the complete success o f both the tax and b o rro w ­in g program s.” W H A T T W O C E N T S A D A Y C A N D O A c c o rd in g to an estimate m ade by the Citizens Public Expenditure Survey o f N e w Y o rk , as reported in the June 30 issue o f T h e N e w Y o r k Taxpayer, a two-cent reduction in the daily per capita cost o f state and local governm ent in the U n ited States w o u ld pay the cost o f a year’s training fo r an army o f h a lf a m illion men. Expenditures o f the state and local governm ents in the U n ited States are approxim ately ten billio n dollars a year. T h is amount is equal to 20 cents per day fo r every man, w om an and child in the country. A two-cent reduction in that per capita cost w o u ld , therefore, provide a billion dollars to be used fo r national defense. Take a L o o k at T h is : A cco rd in g to the M ich igan T a x ­payer, the new English budget calls fo r a 50 per cent in­come tax. A m arried Englishm an must n o w lo o k fo rw a rd to bein g taxed on an income as lo w as $560, a single person on $320. T h e 97 Yz P er cent toP surtax rate means that the in d i­vidu al w ith an income o f $264,000 a year w ill really have a net income o f $20,000 a year after taxes. T h is is just an indication o f w hat m ight be ahead fo r Am erica in our all-out defense effort. T h e m ajority o f the consumers, the little business men and the industrialists are w illin g to sacrifice business and liv in g as usual to national defense and to the aid o f Britain in order to assure ou r national safety. Perhaps it is also time fo r us all to look around and see i f w e can’t do without at least some governm ent as usual to help pay the way.